Obesity is highly associated with sugary drinks that are utilized significantly among the American populace while health officials and policy makers just watch, and emphasize of the exceeding prevalent condition. However, some American policy makers have taken certain measures that most people consider unfit especially those with deprived knowledge of the nutritional impacts of sugary food components. Consequently, the New York City presented a proposal through its mayor and the city's health department that seeks to ban certain big size beverages. However, the proposal has sparked positive and negative responses from the populace, industry holders and health officials throughout New York.
According to the mayor, the city seeks to endorse a comprehensive ban on the provision of soda drinks in bigger bottles together with other sugary drinks served at various public places including street carts and restaurants (CBS). The proposal acts against the escalating obesity cases within the American populace so as to deliver better and healthful future generations. The proposal asserts that the ban only applies to the sugary drinks from various food chains and sports arenas, as well as pre-sweetened iced teas. The proposal sought elimination of sweetened drinks that are above 16 ounces (Grynbaum). However, the ban is exempting diet sodas, dairy-based drinks, fruit juices and alcoholic beverages. In addition, the ban exempts beverages that consumers purchase at convenience and grocery stores.
Soda has become the battleground for the reduction of obesity rates in America with certain schools and public buildings disallowing vending of soda. Statistics demonstrate that above half of the New York adult population stands as overweight or obese (Grynbaum). Approximately half of the obesity rate increment is attributed to uptake of soda, considering that approximately one-third of the New York populace take one or more sweetened drinks.
Nutritional experts have emphasized the feasibility of the proposal despite its rejection, considering that soft drinks have adequate links with obesity and weight gain (Fox). The experts demonstrate the imperativeness of the ban in supporting the diabetes epidemic since obesity is highly linked to diabetes. Additionally, the nutritional experts linked sweetened drinks to nutritional health effects rather than benefits, considering the frequency of intake and lack of nutritional value among these drinks (Fox). The intake of the drinks may also predispose the population to high blood pressure and heart-related illnesses. Studies reveal a linkage between sweetened drinks intake with other high-calorie foods that cause obesity. The high intake of soft drinks is associated with consumption of cakes, pizza, cookies among others (Fox). Therefore, the reduction of the sweetened drinks' intake will bear similar influence on high-calorie food thus lessening the obesity rates.
Over time, the increase in the bottle sizes for soft drinks have been linked with an augment in Type-2 diabetes cases, which may signal negative influences of sweetened drinks. The increment in the bottle sizes demonstrate to the public that soft drinks' intake is desirable despite its health influences on the population. Soft drinks are highly ascribed to the sugary diets among children thus contributing to obesity at early growth stages. According to statistics, among a 10 group of obese people within a particular population, approximately four individuals are children (Gostin). The statistics may be worrying since the healthiness of the future population or generations is uncertain, considering the numerous health effects associated with the obese individuals. The statistics threaten on the upcoming cases of heart disease risk, diabetes and high blood pressure. Therefore, banning of soda may serve as a prerequisite for the reduction of cases these illnesses within the population while promoting healthiness among the New Yorkers. High soft drink intake contributes to considerable weight gain considering that, sweetened drinks supply approximately 355 calories daily. Sweetened drinks intake is addictive, which may lead to additional intake with time causing additional health influences.
The banning of the bigger size drink serving may assist in the elimination of the empty calories presented into the body through soda drinks thus reducing the negative health influences associated with intake of sugary beverages. The ban may also assist considerably in the reduction of intake of junk foods or sugary foods that are often taken together with soda drinks (Fox). Consequently, these reductions in the overall junk food intake may assist in cutting down obesity cases among children and the adult population in general.
Despite the numerous outcries from the soft drink players, some health choices ought to be taken in order to deliver healthy population and generations (Nestle). These health options lie in the arms of the policy makers and those responsible for the health of the general populace. Therefore, the roles of the public health officials and policy makers are paramount in the delivery of alternatives for healthy populations (Nestle). Banning of soda is a controversial element but the option exploited in the delivery of reduced obesity cases and cases associated with obese or overweight population. The contribution of soda or sweetened beverages to obesity, associated illnesses, and uptake of foods associated with obesity may demonstrate the necessity of this proposal for a healthy population. The ban may influence the health of future generations because currently, the health of the existing population is compromised with the increasing obesity cases. Furthermore, the increasing cases of obese children should worry health experts since this may demonstrate that a higher population may emerge as an obese population. This may direct to negative influences on the health systems and future functionality of other systems within the society.