The movie centers on the massacre of a Samurai with four different witnesses that the woodcutter, the samurai via a medium, the priest and a notorious bandit. The woodcutter recognizes the Samurai's body within the forest grove while the priest meets the Samurai as the Samurai travels with his companion through the forest (Kurasawa, 1951). The priest comes into contact with the Samurai prior to his death. The other witness within the Samurai's death case is the notorious bandit. Allegations stand that the bandit massacred the Samurai and raped his companion deep within the forest (Kurasawa, 1951). The witnesses offer four contradictory versions of the Samurai's death although the structure of the presented stories is similar. Although the witnesses present viable explanations for the Samurai's death, the four accounts do not provide a result for the murder case.
The retelling of the four different accounts of the same event mystifies the demise of the nobleman and present contradictory plot for the viewers' understanding. Contradictions arise on the personality who is presenting the truthful explanation and whether the explanations have certain truth. The movie offers clarity that different truths exist for the different characters since the four characters are not dishonest about the murder. Therefore, the characters may not be hiding the reality about the demise for their own protection. According to the film, story versions from the different characters incriminate the narrator on Samurai's murder. The characters and witnesses to Samurai's death appear to deceive themselves regarding the truthfulness of their story versions.
According to scientific research, questions that emanate from events that require certain truths may be presented on contradictory explanations. In case multiple sources provide different and conflicting explanations of an occurrence, a dilemma develops for deciding whether an account is right or truthful. The commonest questions that develop is whether all the accounts offered for a particular episode may be true, and the criteria to utilize for determining the true account of the episode. The presented questions can be reflected to be fundamentally incompatible since the questions present divergent viewpoints on the definition awarded to the truthful accounts and the objective reality.
The film is utilized within a scientifically method-oriented class, considering that it brings out the concepts scientific research that relate to hypothesis and theory creation. Rashomon movie may have some scientific basis since it contains a problem that ought to be solved through the formation of hypothesis. The step that follows in seeking the required answer for the demise of the samurai is the predication of the events in relation to the generated hypothesis. The events can then be tested through further observation or experiments. However, the statements in the movie can only be tested and related to other observations of a similar occurrence either in the past or the future. After the testing of the generated hypothesis regarding the demise of the Samurai and adjustment of the theory according to the observational results, analysis is the next step although this can take different perspectives according to the situational complexity.
The perspective presented through the four witnesses relates to concepts of the positivist and interpretivist approaches commonly exploited in the analysis of scientific elements. The accounts in Rashomon movie may be explained through the utilization of the positivist or interpretivist approaches that scientists and researchers utilize in the analysis of various concepts within various fields. The positivist approach can be utilized within the movie in determining the true account. The positivist approach asserts that true explanations to episodes or causes of certain events can be evaluated or assessed through the scientific criteria of verification (Wendy & Mehta, 2002).
Conversely, the interpretivist approach fails to unearth the objective truth in the determination of the true account. In case of the four different accounts presented in the film, the analyst may consider the revelations offered through the versions rather than following the account that appears more truthful. The analyst ought to consider the witness positions within the social structure and comprehension of worldly events.
The film may have a basis within a scientific methods class, considering that the four accounts may necessitate dissimilar analytical lenses. The questions that are raised in the analysis of the four accounts of the same episode, which is the murder of the nobleman or the Samurai, can be answered through the utilization of research methods. The research methods may be considered effective in the light that they allow replication and enable the probing of the causal assumptions through the utilization of additional cases (Wendy & Mehta, 2002).
The Rashomon incidences involving the four witnesses possessing different and conflicting accounts of the demise case might utilize research techniques in which the four explanations may be considered, as data points. While utilizing the different and conflicting explanations as data points, the nature of the murder case may be reviewed through an evaluation of the principal social forces within the community that hosts the case.
The Rashomon film presents events that cannot be solved through logical techniques but rather the explanations can only be resolved through scientific research. Provision of the required solution can only be obtained through the evaluation of the four accounts that are contradictory but at the same time appear to be true. Recognition of the true accounts might involve changes in the analytical lenses of the accounts and might involve the utilization of research methods. Determination of the actual killer may necessitate the introduction of a scientific theory starting with the identification of the case problem, development of an appropriate hypothesis, testing the generated hypothesis, collection of further information through observation and analysis of the generated results. The positivist approach considers that all four accounts are true thus necessitating the use of scientific criteria of verification. The scientific criteria of verification focus on the utilization of scientific methods for delivering the required scientific explanation that may be true. Contrary to the positivist approach, interpretivist approach concentrates on other aspects instead of concentrating on the objective truth of the episodes. Therefore, the interpretivist approach, which has a scientific basis, concentrates the observer's or viewer's perception of the episode or event.